archived the channel

@Jeremy G has joined the channel

Hi. Can I ask someone to take a look at https://github.com/cloudposse/packages/issues/1622 ? Thanks.

heads up - packages broke today

see https://sweetops.slack.com/archives/C01CTC4PXC1/p1612311238002400

hey all, I was adding a few extra packages, but keep hitting some failing builds such as

https://github.com/cloudposse/packages/pull/415/checks?check_run_id=1252257801

This is expected right? Since I wouldn't have access to this. Just wondering if I'm missing something 🙂

@Stephen Lucero has joined the channel

Adding @U010XGY9B46 bot

@bradym has joined the channel

That's cool of you Maxim, thanks much!

@Zachary Loeber all PRs are merged and here is the release: <https://github.com/cloudposse/packages/releases/tag/0.129.0>

@UUB28NLDS help keep tabs! 😉

there are some changes required to make this package happens

@Zachary Loeber please, take a loot at <https://github.com/cloudposse/packages/pull/329>

@Zachary Loeber expect a flood of merge notifications 🙂

yes, let’s do a call

@Maxim Mironenko (Cloud Posse) are you free now?

Let’s do just one, then I will take care of others

I think we are going to review with him tonight

I had to delegate these, but Maxim has a question for me as he is new to the repo

@Maxim Mironenko (Cloud Posse) has joined the channel

@Maxim Mironenko (Cloud Posse) ☝️ :-)

My PRs are piling up. Have I been missing something on these that make them unworthy?

I better watch this one for certain 🙂

https://share.vidyard.com/watch/SkGi3ejGmEL3Bm4mZjETXR?

It's far from complete, but a start

I recorded an intro video of how our packages repo works

I looked into consul configuration and the idea of manually loading it with values defeats the purpose of config as code to me so I found this thing and figured I'd give it a whirl.

I'm not yet. But I was planning on putting it to use in some pipeline tasks to bootstrap/update key-pair values for projects with consul. Not a good idea?

@Zachary Loeber i am curious - how are you using gonsul? haven't heard/seen of this before.

https://livebook.manning.com/book/gitops-and-kubernetes <- worth keeping an eye on

That's sensible to me good sir, thanks a bunch

almost never is a raw resource sufficient.

modules are for business logic

it's always our pattern though

100%

So short answer, starting net new, would you still use your module over default provider code?

your modules are impressive btw, no i'm not hitting on you, I have a wife.

or maybe I'm just never happy with the basics and its a matter of perspective....

I'm going to have to say that is the same for Azure. The moment you need to do anything beyond the basics you almost instantly hit a wall

it is very low-level/raw

the thing is nothing is ever easy on AWS

so now the default provider is pretty fully fleshed out (finally)

I've seen the provider released half a dozen times over to fix and generally overcome a good deal of my prior workarounds and such

After using the provider for azure to create aks clusters over the last year

I'll pester you more on the next one if other things don't take priority for your time

best to ask on #office-hours hours and I can go into details

there are many limitations and tradeoffs with each flavor

and fargate profiles (like running fargate)

managed node pools (supported by provider), called by terraform